Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payable on Death (finance)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 08:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Payable on Death (finance)

Payable on Death (finance) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article uses the second person, is unsourced and appears to be a possible copy-and-paste. Gilliam 02:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete, incoherent and unsalvagable article. Not at all encyclopedic. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 03:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete per the above. Nothing to be salvaged from this one. MartinDK 04:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and then possibly redirect to Totten trust. The reason I say "possibly redirect" rather than just plain "redirect" is that the title "Payable on Death (finance)" is an unlikely search term. --Metropolitan90 04:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Pretty blatant advertising, and has the distinct flavor of a copyvio. Blueboy96 04:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball delete.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 09:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Payable on Deletion. Delete per above. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 17:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Probably should have been a candidate for speedy delete as spam, but there are a multitude of other reasons to spike it ASAP. - RPIRED 00:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.