Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paxism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paxism

Paxism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This appears to be a new philosophy, that is not yet notable. Although Goole throws up a lot, they are mostly unrelated, forums, or blogs. Delete unless sources can be found. J Milburn 20:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment: Perhaps worth noting that this is the users first and (as of now) only contribution. It seems to be good faith, just non notable. J Milburn 21:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I know that this is a first edit, and I have no intention at all of critising or attacking the author in any way. But the subject of the article fails both WP:NN and WP:OR.--Anthony.bradbury 21:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: I have contacted the author and explained, in detail, the issues with the article. J Milburn 21:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
As I see you have. Second mistake in two minutes. Things are not going well... J Milburn 21:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I am the author of Paxism, and I do not believe it noteworthy enough to be included on Wikipedia. I do not know the person who published it here, but he sent me a message this evening on myspace. Apparently, he thought of using the term in a novel he is writing, searched google and found my philosophy, liked it, and copied it here. I am pleased to see that it has an appeal, but it is really not relevant enough to merit an article here. --Mindbender 22:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a test of knowledge or trivia game. It is an encyclopedia. This article is either trivia or a test.--Sefringle 08:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.