Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawel Plaszczak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pawel Plaszczak

Pawel Plaszczak (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable. Reads like business advert/cv.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  02:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Self-promotion. /Blaxthos 05:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Member of the Ian Foster' Globus Project and author of very first book for managers concerning Grid computing /Paladin1979 11:52:21, 21 March 2007 (CET)
  • Delete worked in some cool places, did some cool stuff, no non-trivial secondary sources. Not notable per Wikipedia standards, which is not in any way a reflection on his worth as an individual. Guy (Help!) 14:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Classic self-promotion. Biruitorul 20:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Unless the article is re-written, it is blatant self-advertising. -- Wenli 00:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as it does not assert notablity per WP:BIO and violates WP:SOAP. --Roswell native 03:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep he's among few people mentioned in Grid computing article. If you would like to look for second sources, here's an interview with P.P. in PrimeurMagazine. So why keep the articles of others listed in biography of Grid computing term? /Paladin1979 13:40:21, 22 March 2007 (CET) Please do not vote multiple times.--Seattle Skier (talk) 23:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Rather Keep And I've just found some better article about that guy on GridToday /LukeWolf 14:40:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC) User has no contributions other than this vote.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  17:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Self promotion, not notable. Note: multiple keep votes above are from same account. --Seattle Skier (talk) 23:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. OK. If the majority see that topic in such a way so delete it. But will it last empty ?? Note: I didn't know that I cannot answer your arguments more than once. --Paladin1979 16:19, 22 March 2007 (CET)
    • You can comment as much as you want, just note that the vote is 'comment' and don't begin this with 'keep' or 'delete'. If you change your vote, delete or strike out the old one. It's all described here.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  17:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. I'm still very curious why there can't be article about this guy and there can be articles about others, mentioned in Grid computing topic. If this guy is the author of the very first book form managers concerning grids, so he done something as first right? So it should be notable fact, right? And please don't right it's self-promotion because I am not Mr. Plaszczak and that's funny. --Paladin1979 20:56, 24 March 2007 (CET)
  • Move to Grid computing, the savvy manager's guide - considering the number of reviews I come up with on a Google search (EnterTheGrid, Globus Consortium Journal, GridToday, and that's just on the first page of hits), I think this may qualify under Wikipedia:Notability (books)#Academic books. If there was only one author, I'd say just keep the author article (and not have one on the book), but there's not enough notability to justify having an article on both authors. Lyrl Talk C 20:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.