Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pav (3rd nomination)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - redirected - SimonP 22:59, May 12, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pav

Unverifiable neologism and/or personal attack. Only hits for pav "role playing" are coincidental uses of the words, not as defined in the article. It would just be a dic def even if it did have any basis in reality. Niteowlneils 00:22, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Note. New article is completely different than either of the two versions previously VfD'd via the discussions below. Niteowlneils 00:22, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Now shown at Template:VfD-Pav and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Pav in order to restore the archival of the previous discussions. Rossami (talk)

• Delete. I agree with Niteowlneils. Svest 01:12, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm in agreement. It's not encyclopedic, and is more insulting than anything. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:14, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, neologism. Megan1967 05:14, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, as above --Simon Cursitor 07:27, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Comment - the article is now a disambiguation. Grutness|^hello? 06:22, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this; then make a new entry for pav as a redirect to Pavlova. -- BD2412 ^think 19:47, 2005 May 10 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.