Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul wesley weber

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete ˉˉanetode╦╩ 15:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paul wesley weber

Paul wesley weber (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

(Apparently) autobiographical article that doesn't assert notability of subject until it gets near the end. The "Henry Ford II Falcon Film Fest" sounds reputable, but doesn't come up with anything relevant in Google (not even changing the wording around a bit), and there is little for "City Boi" that shows its notability. Fourohfour 00:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete vote, obviously, though if creator comes up with good case I'm happy to change this. Note that article wasn't tagged speedy (well, not by me at any rate). Fourohfour 00:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. The article doesn't seem to have any notability, and being a film student does not make somebody notable. Seems to be a hobbyist movie maker. --Dennisthe2 00:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete nn vanity ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Vanity article about a non-notable person--양복42 02:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - no sources with assert or support notability. --Haemo 02:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - This guy couldn't even be arsed to capitalise his own name in the title. TVshot 03:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - per anything and everything above. ChristopherJones 04:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, WP:N violation. Appleworm 09:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete vain second year film student. Ohconfucius 10:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - The reasons above explain this vote.
  • Delete Violation of WP:BIO and WP:NN, his middle and surname are not even capitalised!Tellyaddict 16:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete violates WP:BIO and WP:AUTO. Vanity. Only one Google search result. - Anas Talk? 16:49, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - great example of biased autobiography. Violates WP:AUTO, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOTE. - Pious7 17:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom and other users. --Ozgod 20:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and other users. Bigtop 23:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom and other users. (Small Comment: Short reason cause everybody else basically explained it) Nol888(Talk) 00:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete , not that I have to repeat it, per WP:N, WP:V and WP:BLP AlfPhotoman 01:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BIO. I don't think WP:COI is a reason for deletion in general (the identity of the author has no necessary relationship with the quality of the article). -- Black Falcon 06:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.