Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Witney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  16:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Witney

WP:AUTO and WP:VAIN. Does make some notability claims, though, which should probably be reviewed by someone familiar with the field. Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 17:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

• mild delete though this person may be notable and may merit an article, this specific article is
  • completely unsourced
  • written completely by user:paulwitney

JianLi 17:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

• Userfy. Wouldn't mind if the article was recreated when it's written by someone other than the subject. Isopropyl 23:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — AUTO and VAIN as above. — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 02:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:V. --Satori Son 04:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

The information comes from his website. Looks like a standard biography. --User:michaelijean

Comment - yes, a standard biography that was written/uploaded by the person themselves. If he's notable enough, somebody else will eventually recreate it without copying it from somewhere else. — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 11:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.