Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Morris (producer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Morris (producer)

Paul Morris (producer) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Proded for notability, prod removed with statement "Prominent, controversial pornographer". Procedural nomination, I have no opinion. CitiCat ^♫ 00:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep, due to there not being anyone arguing to delete. If you have no opinion, why are you nominating it? The point of a PROD removal isn't to automatically be converted to an AFD as a "procedural". It can be nominated for AFD if someone really thinks it should be deleted, but it shouldn't be automatic. You will also notice that the PROD removal was accompanied by adding a paragraph of text, with inline reference, and 2 external links,[1] which should make the notability issue rather clear. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 01:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

I moved it here because the same user restored the prod notice, which meant that user did not understand procedure. I assume the user would want to continue the discussion. This seemed inevitable, so we might as well have it while you're focused on the subject and get it over with. CitiCat ^♫ 04:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - Appears to demonstrate notability. --DAJF 02:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k 02:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep: Needs more sources, but appears notable. - Rjd0060 05:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Notable subject, needs more sources. — Save_Us_229 06:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Most porn studios are little more than a handful of people, so it is safe to assume Morris plays a major role there. Treasure Island is noted for winning an award for Best US Studio, so I would say this would be one instance where notability does transfer from the studio to the producer. Tabercil 03:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• KEEP: I'm not sure if I'm entering this comment page correctly but as Morris is arguably the world's most well-known (best known) bareback porn producer it would seem as if he should not even be considered for deletion. If anything, the entry should be expanded. If I knew more about the man (aside from knowing his movies) I would be glad to add to his write-up! -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agateforce (talk • contribs) 13:53, November 16, 2007

You need to put your opinion at the bottom, actually, I moved it down for you. And please do expand the article, there are several interviews added as external links to use as sources. Just say where you get each fact, put a <ref> tag stating the source; take a look at how a few are already done in the article. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 17:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Or if you can figure out how the <ref> tag works, just put the link in square brackets after the fact and someone else can do the ref work. Tabercil (talk) 03:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.