Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Lu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 07:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Lu

• Seems like a vanity page. Don't see anything real notable --Nv8200p (talk) 22:06, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• strong delete I've been looking at all the VfDs today and this is one of the clearest cases I've seen of nn vanity resume cruft.---CH (talk) 08:16, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. Delete resumes. —Cryptic (talk) 09:12, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. *drew 11:30, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, however, I don't think this is as cut and dry as fellow wikipedians are making out. Consider that wikipedia seems to have a policy that it's okay to have whole articles dedicated to individual, seemingly non-notable high schools (mostly just those in the US though). This man is at least a published and accomplished educator / researcher. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qirex (talk • contribs) 12:55, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete yeah I know it sucks about the school things and hopefully over time people will see the light on those issues, but as is this still is not notable. Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 15:12, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
• Wow! Not only an "...excellent researcher, he is also considered to be an exceptionally fine teacher"! And at a college no less! Here come the Inclusionazis ! Oh, I mean: Delete, per above. Eaglizard 13:38, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.