Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul D. Weber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was userfy. Johnleemk | Talk 13:47, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Paul D. Weber

Was tagged for speedy deletion by User:Larsinio as nn-bio. I wasn't sure about the "Raabe Prize for Sacred Composition" so I'm bringing it here instead. howcheng {chat} 23:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• Userfy is what I would probably have done, since the creator is User:Weberc, so evidently related ( a bad idea. The scale of composition does not look that significant (many instrumentalists I know also write a few dozen things a year, usually performed by friends, which may encompass ensembles of world-famous musicians, but not published or notable). Needs more data, and it woudl be better if done by a neutral third party. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 23:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy (i.e. Delete from main space) I dig the photo and I'm sure he's a nice chap, but we need to have articles on notable living people only. This genetleman is not notable enough yet. --kingboyk 00:43, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy per JzG. Stifle 02:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Dr. Weber and I are NOT related. We know each other though Lenoir-Rhyne College; he is a Professor of Music. His work in the sacred music program there is indicative of the continuing St. Olaf College tradition of music via F. Melius Christianen, well know American musician in the sacred music field. Dr. Weber my not be noteworthy enough yet I know; however, his continuing contribution to the sacred music major (i.e., making it a recognizable field) and his well known and award winning compositions, make his an influential musician in the church music of today.User:WeberC, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.