The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Neil (►) 09:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Written by subject. Reads like an advertisement. Original research. COI. Drat (Talk) 10:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep on the basis of his TV appearances (CNN interview among them, if it checks out). The article does need to be cleaned up to remove peacock terms and that unencyclopedic laundry list of accomplishments. Deranged bulbasaur 11:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Weak delete. Appears non-notable at the moment. --Edwin Herdman 12:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.