Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Burton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 20:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Paul Burton
Not really notable, references are to minor stories of no significance. No evidence to back up some claims, and even if they were backed up doesn't make him notable anyway. I had to do a minor edit and it still seems like some of the page is actually a kind of personal attack page. Canterbury Tail talk 02:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:N. Writing for a credible secondary source is not the same as being the subject of such a reference. OlenWhitaker • talk to me or don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 02:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 02:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per User:OlenWhitaker above. Writing a lot doesn't make you notable, having people write about you is what does it. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC).
- Delete: A working journalist. No indication that he stands out in the field. Utgard Loki (talk) 12:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
