Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patriot myth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 05:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Patriot myth

Patriot myth (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is a very obscure topic, barely notable, if at all. The article has no sourcing as to why it should be considered notable. I see some connection with a website called teamlaw.org but generally looking to websites is a poor measure of notability because they too often contain original research. I see a few references in books[1] and the book coverage[2] seems unrelated to the topic in the article. Maybe there a case to be made why this topic is notable, but I don't see it yet. SaltyBoatr 21:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No sources, few Ghits. This doesn't appear to be an encyclopedic topic. It appears more like an original research essay. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete What a bizarre little article, almost a "stream of consciousness", WUI type thing. It's subdivided into "Some common patriot myths" (there are 3)

and "Some legal arguments called 'frivolous' by some but which others consider meritorious" (they're not tax protestors, they're illegal tax protestors). Mandsford 01:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. There's a bit at Admiralty Court on this; I have a dim memory that there was a full article once on the "Admiralty flag" thing, but got deleted due to all the sources failing WP:RS. If we can't manage an article on the subtopic we may not need to bother with a list. --Dhartung | Talk 03:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete due to lack of reliable sources, potential original research concerns. Majoreditor 18:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.