Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Artel

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete

[edit] Patrick Artel

Google does not recognise. Truly a terrible, unencyclopedic article SqueakBox 04:26, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Comment Altavista comes up with this, from which we learn that he has made several films that IMDB has never heard of. The article is badly written, but that at least can be fixed.

• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 08:01, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity/possible attack page: "He was a shy skinny kid with braces and big crooked nose.He became a delinquent child and a low grade student and he was bullied alot in schools and often ridiculed by his classmate.He was often kicked out from many highschool for his pranks and deliquent manner.He would suffered many pain and operation to correct his facial features thru out his life." - Mgm|^(talk) 09:12, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per MgM. — mark ✎ 10:49, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. the wub (talk) 12:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn teenage vanity, I just rv-ed it from blanking. --Etacar11 15:15, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: He's 30, so he's not a teen, alas. Just a vanity article. Geogre 19:31, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Truly a si$k gangsta mofo.--64.229.218.142 19:57, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for absolute non-notablity. --Lord Voldemort 21:17, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.