The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. RobertT | @ | C 04:14, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete hoax, bad joke, not good enough for BJAODN —Wahoofive (talk) 16:49, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Nonsense, but not patently so. — PhilWelch 18:08, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete nonsense. Xoloz 14:49, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.