Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paternal bond

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paternal bond

Paternal bond (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This page is unsourced original research. I posted a {{verify}} tag more than a year ago, and there's been no progress since. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 09:53, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment. Awwww, this is so cute :-)... LMAO.... I'm almost inclined to vote for keeping this, the way it states the obvious is quite disarming :-). If the author added a link to the statistics he mentions, I wouldn't have a problem with this article... It's certainly written in good faith. --Targeman 10:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
    • I very recently saw a chart about saliva testoterone levels compared by single men, men with girlfriends, married men, and married men with children. Must have been in the abstract of a research paper or something. Anyway this article [1] (non-scientific report on scientific research) supports that, for example, though I'm not sure whether that saves the page from the charge of being WP:OR. cab 11:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Significant family-studies concept. Compare Maternal bond. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Obviously a real issue and not OR. SOFIXIT. violet/riga (t) 13:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, and original research is not the same thing as unreferenced. --Dhartung | Talk 17:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep needing cleanup/expansion doesn't equal unencyclopedic OR. VanTucky (talk) 18:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. The article contains nothing to alarm of being false. Although it must be referenced, especially the testosterone stuff. `'Míkka 19:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep needs work, not deletion. WP:SOFIXIT Dhaluza 20:14, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.