Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat's Hubba Hubba (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. — JIP | Talk 07:34, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pat's Hubba Hubba

first nom I am renominting this sock infected vfd 5keep/10delete again. still a nn resterant just to many out there --JAranda | watz sup 01:15, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep verifiable restaurant with references from the New York Times and ESPN making it notable enough for mineCapitalistroadster 01:26, 21 October 2005 (UTC).
• Keep decent article with verification. Chick Bowen 02:20, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete As it is still not notable. Marcus22 14:28, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, every medium sized town has a semi-famous restraunt. -- Kjkolb 15:40, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
• keep, media coverage. Wikipedia has space for one restaurant per medium-sized town. Kappa 16:19, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. Every restaurant gets reviewed; they don't get an encyclopedia entry. --JJay 19:48, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Not every small-town restaurant gets noted by the Times and ESPN. Borderline notable, but still notable. - Sensor 23:07, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. Bwithh 23:10, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom and JJay. MCB 00:59, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: this is just one of the restaurants in my town that have gotten major media mentions and I can think of several more. I don't think any of them should have articles. -- Kjkolb 09:58, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• The article hyperlinks to several people independent of this restaurant writing about it. Google Web turns up a lot more. The WP:CORP criteria are satisfied. Keep. Uncle G 17:01, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep informative article. Enough media attention and per Ungle G. Alf ^melmac 10:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep but clean it up, it's a mess. --devotchka Devotchka 22:13, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Needs a bit of attention, but otherwise fine. Unfocused 02:17, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Biermacht the author here. This article is verifiable and encyclopedic. JAranda, how many times are you going to nominate this article for deletion? I am thinking you have some personal vendetta. Please read Wikipedia's Limitations on renomination for AfD because you have just violated it. You renominated it only 2 weeks after the administrators decided to keep it. Oh, and to JAranda, Marcus22, and all the "per-nom" and "nn" voters, once again, notablity is not a criterion for deletion.Biermacht 16:51, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.