Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasta brownie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 00:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pasta brownie

Pasta brownie (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article reads completely of nonsense. Even if it is true, it is clearly not notable. The creator of this article also removed a valid picure from the Italian cuisine article for a regional cuisine and added the picture of this (food?). I believe it should have been deleted under speedy deletion but an Admin. removed the tag which is why I am bringing it here. A combination of the articles ludicrous content and the vandalism the user committed using the article leaves me very suspect. Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 05:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Additional comment - a look of the users contributions will also show that they placed the picture of this "dish" in a large number of article, such as Dessert, Fusion cuisine, Pasta, Sandwich, Lasagna, Square academic cap, Chocolate brownie, Sloppy joe, Lasagna (song). Leads to further belief in the article being vandalism.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 06:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable, quite possibly a hoax. Nothing worth repeating on google about this. --TeaDrinker 05:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for the reasons I posted on the initial {{prod}}. To quote, "Have every reason to believe this is a hoax. Such an unusual creation would surely be noted on Google, but there are no relevant search results. In addition, the copyright tag on the image page is highly suspect, claiming that the photograph seen on this page was published in 1949 and has thus lapsed into public domain. However, a Google image search once again provides no relevant hits." --jonny-mt(t)(c) 06:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

• Apart from anything else, the photo has clearly been (very poorly) Photoshopped together, and I don't believe they had Photoshop in 1949 ChrisTheDude 10:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Hmm, looks good! Not notable at all, though. Kevin 06:44, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete weird! it does look good, but yeah, WP:N not so much Carter | Talk to me 07:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete does not look good (chocolate pasta? x_x), but really per TeaDrinker's reasoning. JuJube 07:44, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Googled it, in quotes, and the only thing to come up on the first page was a restaurant which sells Pasta and Brownies at the same price. Most likely a hoax. Bensmith53 09:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - hoax, or joke or whatever it is, it is not notable. Iamchrisryan 12:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• As amusing as this is, the photo was derived from http://archone.tamu.edu/archcom/InsideTrack/Images/lasagna.jpg and so I have deleted it as a copyright violation. Unless someone has any objections, I think this article can be snowed/deleted. --B 14:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Comment - well he's added the picture back again. Along with some other odd picture.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 21:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. This appears to be a hoax intended to justify the (now deleted) image which the same contributor tried to insert into no less than 10 separate articles (including replacing the cover of a music album called 'lasagna', which is not the action of someone interested in making constructive edits). Cosmo0 18:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete there is no such thing. Yamaguchi先生 02:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.