Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Passive aerobic exercise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Passive aerobic exercise

Passive aerobic exercise is an oxymoron. This article was created by a user whose other edits include three other articles promoting the Chi Machine, its manufacturers and designers. See aerobic exercise for a proper treatment of the subject. This is snake-oil promotion, whether or not the Chi Machine article is deleted. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 11:16, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete wikispam.--nixie 14:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Quackery already has plenty of available forums. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 15:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, pseudosciencecruft. --Cyde Weys _vote^talk 18:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• What is wrong with you people? Do none of you understand health and fitness? Have any of you bothered to research passive aerobic exercise and write a better explanation? Obviously not. PASSIVE aerobic exercise is LOW impact aerobic exercise. Delete if you like but thank God librarys and dictionarys are still in existence because Wikipedia appears to be a joke based on this past weeks experience of my apparantly awful attempts to add a few subjects that were not listed. I thought personal beliefs had no place in Wikipedia. Sorry i am so terribly wrong. Go ahead and delete everything you guys don't personally believe in. Are you going to delete astology too? No suprise if you do. --User Angel26 05:57 28 December 2005 (UTC)
• Why is it that your kind always plays the hurt-innocent-contributor card at this point of the process? The stench of overacted drama is so thick it's sickening. I'd suggest you leave and spare us all the indignity of having to witness such ludicrous outbursts. All you had to do was produce evidence for the article's claims, but since you decided to act in such insipidly melodramatic manner, I have no compunctions about voting Delete. Goodbye and good riddance.--Agamemnon2 09:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.