Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Passel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-19 12:24Z

[edit] Passel

Passel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Dictionary definition, already exists on Wiktionary Ksbrowntalk 00:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Do you mean delete?--Dacium 06:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:WINAD not a dictionary...--Dacium 06:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per above. Daniel5127 | Talk 07:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete What they said. Scalene•UserPage•Talk•Contributions•Biography•Є• 10:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 12:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as dicdef.-- danntm T C 13:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - Does it fall under CSD A5 as a transwiki-ed articles? Because if it weren't already there, everyone would be voting to transwiki it to Wiktionary. Maybe A5 should be expanded? --Plutor talk 14:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete What the nominator said. Inkpaduta 15:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete WP:NOT#Dictionary.TellyaddictEditor review! 16:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete A) WP:NOT#Dictionary B)Is it under a CSD? Either way, unnecessary. --tennisman sign here! 18:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - perhaps put {{wi}} in its place. GassyGuy 01:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.