Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partridge Green Football Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 04:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Partridge Green Football Club

Was tagged for speedy deletion but didn't look like a speedy. Felt that it should go through an AFD. Just nominating, no opinion from me. --Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 05:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Apparently this club is at the 13th level of the English football system. Generally clubs below level 10 are not considered notable enough to warrant articles on Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 06:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. I think it's at the 12th position, actually. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 13:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• Subcomment. Apparently, 11th position is notable enough, as many 11th position teams have articles (and a good few 12th position teams as well, including one league that has practically all 12th position teams with articles, and a league template to boot). _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 13:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• Established consensus, as stated in WP:CORP is that only clubs in levels 1-10 are considered notable (see archived discussion). A systematic deletion of clubs below that level needs to be performed but I haven't had the time recently. Qwghlm 13:48, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. If this club is at level 12 as English football league system implies, why does the main article on West Sussex Football League indicate that its top level (one level above this club) is at level 12? I'm just asking; the answer won't affect my recommendation either way. --Metropolitan90 03:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - fails notability criterion for English football clubs as laid out in WP:CORP. Qwghlm 07:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Too low down in league tier system, plus the article is virtually empty anyway. Djdannyp 07:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom ST47 11:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CORP. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 14:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete close to empty, well below the level where there is likely to be significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Just zis Guy you know? 19:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Qwghlm. Leuko 19:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Alias Flood 23:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This article is simply a stub and content is being expanded. Several teams from the 13th position are listed. --msabag21:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.