Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partially lost film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 23:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Partially lost film

Partially lost film (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unreferenced, non-notable list. Oli Filth 01:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete The article Lost film already has such a list. While that list is also unsourced, the article is of far better quality than this one. This could theoretically be brought back if there was anything even resembling sourcing. Montco 02:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The article Lost Film has a list .Feel no need for another list. Harlowraman 04:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above; furthermore, a bunch of the films listed were never lost. (A film which had some scenes removed before release is "edited", not "partially lost".) Zetawoof_(ζ) 04:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect be bold and redirect it to Lost film. Lugnuts 08:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.