Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parody religion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:49, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Parody religion

non notable 198.214.51.1 19:24, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Keep parody religions are numerous and interesting. It's virtually a sub-genre of comedy - lostsocks
• Keep. There are enough of them out there. Smerdis of Tlön 22:08, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep extremely notable -CunningLinguist 22:34, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep My concern is where to draw the line between parody and real religions. --Xcali 23:59, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Strong keep - creating parodies of religions is a concept with an ancient pedigree. -- BD2412 ^talk 00:51, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
• Keep. Article is a good summary and notable topic. Capitalistroadster 03:11, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Quite a nice article so far, don't understand the nomination at all. --Unfocused 04:09, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep there are many of these out there. Revolución 04:19, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep legitimate topic. carmeld1 00:04, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep agree with Revolución Falphin 19:51, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, unless we are going to delete Religion. ~~~~ 22:36, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.