Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parliamentary unstability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Content could be merged but you should be mindful of WP:NOR W.marsh 23:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Parliamentary unstability

Parliamentary unstability (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I'm not too sure what to make of this (and I'm a political scientist!) For a start, the page has a strange edit history - it STARTED as a redirect. I have never heard the phrase 'parliamentary unstability' - Instability might make some sense. Regardless, the whole is confused and confusing, not helped by some strange vocabulary (favorized). In addition, no references or sources; possible OR? Emeraude 00:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as original research. No sources, no clear definition, full of weasel words and backtracking. --Dhartung | Talk 05:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to Minority government seeing that looks to be that some of the content can be included in that article and that most of it charactirises of a minority government which often leds to parlimentarity unstability for example what it is happening at the National Assembly of Quebec right now.--JForget 18:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Minority government. Does seem to be used occasionally in this context but does not merit it's own article as it covers the same topic as minority government. Davewild 19:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.