Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parker trio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-01-02 08:42Z

[edit] Parker trio

Parker trio (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

The article was originally nominated for speedy deletion per A7, no assertion of notability. There's some assertion of notability in the awards they have won, but I'm not in a position to tell whether those awards are notable enough to avoid regular deletion. I'm moving this to AFD instead. No opinion. Aecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 13:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletions and in the list of Music-related deletions. Aecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 13:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I would say that multiple significant awards from the Canadian Gospel Music Association provides some encyclopedic merit for this article. Agent 86 21:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. Agent 86 22:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Conscious 21:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep The awards are certainly a claim of notability, only I don't know how notable the awards are. The group's site doesn't provide much as far as references except for pastors from around North America (though this could indicate that they've toured the continent). A surprisingly high 1,080 total and 188 unique hits for "Parker Trio"+"Southern Gospel", though I didn't see many from particularly reliable sources. Overall, it's not much, but I think there's enough here to satisfy WP:MUSIC. -- Kicking222 22:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Appear to be more noteable than plenty of other bands allowed with no problems Iridescenti 19:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.