Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parish Episcopal School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. ---J.S ^(T/C) 22:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Parish Episcopal School

Parish Episcopal School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

From speedy, decided to bring to AfD. The original speedy reason was a lack of notability, but A7 doesn't apply to schools. This is procedural - no opinion. Coredesat 13:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete just a school --Sandy Scott 14:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete since I was the user who originally nominated this for a speedy. Would someone be kind enough to provide a pointer to a guideline or discussion regarding the minimum requirement for schools? Obviously, the information provided could cause me to have to review my position. LittleOldMe 14:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for now. The article fails to establish any notability- at this point, the subject very clearly fails WP:SCHOOLS3. The school gets a fair amount of Google hits, but I couldn't find any non-trivial coverage from reliable sources. If I missed something in Google searching, then I would certainly be willing to alter my !vote. -- Kicking222 16:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I had put it up for speedy for a copyright violation, which was then taken out (still in the history, everything before my edit). But the article does not establish notability, and no sources I could find give any notability either. As for guidelines for schools, there are currently none, we have long discussions at WP:SCHOOL and WP:SCHOOL3, but although some progress has been made, neither seems probable to become a guideline soon. Still, this school doesn't seem to reach the requirements of either disputed guideline. Fram 21:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per my belief that all secondary schools, including K-12 schools, are notable for inclusion. No objection to deleting and starting over from reliable sources though, as this article apparently does not have any unless I've missed them somewhere within the article history. Yamaguchi先生 02:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:SCHOOLS3. GRBerry 04:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.