Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parish (Band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Parish (Band)

Parish (Band) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This is a contested speedy which has apparently been deleted before. I'm listing it here for more discussion, but removing the hangon tag (speedy tag had already been removed). I am neutral at this point, not having tried myself to find notability. Aleta Sing 03:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep per WP:MUSIC#C6. I mentioned this on the talk page, but two of the founding members of Parish are also not only current members of, but also founding members of, Crimson Glory, a hugely influential band in the Progressive Metal genre... which, I believe, satisfies a notability requisite, does it not? 6wolf2112 (talk) 08:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Sort of borderline here, but it meets #6 of WP:MUSIC (members of otherwise notable bands). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Incredibly Weak Keep It has improved since the last deletion, but it still fails to assert notability. The only thing going for it is that its members founded a marginally notable band whose own article happens to be a redlink hell. Trusilver 15:18, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.