Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parentectomy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 00:19, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Parentectomy

VfD banner but no corresponding VfD page. NPOV neologism, in any event. Same author as NPOV rant Best Interest of the Child (which has since been rewritten, but should probably still be redirected). Delete. -- 8^D ^gab 15:06, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)

• Merge with Father's rights. Klonimus 16:29, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I have heard this term used but not in the context on the page: it was a case where a child applied to the court to cut off all parental rights of one of their parents. The page itself is POV and the subject is adequately covered in other articles in NPOV, hence Delete. Dbiv 16:45, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism and POV to boot. Arkyan 16:55, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism, propaganda. Gazpacho 17:28, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete funny but unnotable. DJ Clayworth 18:16, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. —Seselwa 18:36, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. RickK 20:54, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:30, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, POV, neologism. Megan1967 10:04, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Apologies for my poor protocol. I'll figure this all out eventually. Anyway, Delete. NPOV (even the title). Kine 20:21, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.