Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parchester Village, Richmond, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nishkid64 03:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Parchester Village, Richmond, California

Parchester Village, Richmond, California (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Master-planned communities do not warrant individual articles; nothing asserting notability that isn't touched on in the Richmond, California article remains once POV-text is factored out. Bumm13 01:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. There are other articles about Richmond neighborhoods, though their notability is up for debate as well. Maybe it would be a good idea to merge those into the main city article, though that article is a bit long. Realkyhick 06:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Cities and towns are inherently notable. Neighborhoods within are not. This one does not assert much in the way of notability. Resolute 14:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Neighborhoods are not inherently notable, but not inherently non-notable. So we return to that old stand by, non trivial 3rd part sources. And the references are attached. Thus a notable neighborhood.Obina 15:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Seems notable and referenced. I would argue that many neighborhoods that are less interesting and notable than this one are inherently notable due to delineating geographical areas within urban areas. Neighborhoods in the burbs that are only visited by residents and visitors are not. By this I mean that Sunset District, San Francisco, California is even less notable than the neighborhood in question but delineates a section of a city. "Oh yes out on the west side of town over the hill where the little boxy houses are."--Nick Y. 00:05, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The outside sources are trivial - one is about a development fight over land next door - allowing that would allow every single neighborhood that's ever been part of a development fight to claim notability; the other is a puff piece. This is a neighborhood in the burbs only visited by residents and visitors. Argyriou (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep It's a notable neighborhood. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 23:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.