Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parapoliticology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Parapoliticology

Neologism. Gadren 00:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. "...is a word coined in 2006" 'nuff said. Fan1967 00:52, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• I concur Delete for reasons noted above SailorfromNH Talk - Contrib 01:23, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Deville (Talk) 02:19, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Arbusto 02:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Agree with nom -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 03:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. --Terence Ong 08:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 08:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete term coined in 2006 by Loren Coleman, posted by lcoleman@foo. So no signs of WP:VAIN there, then. Just zis Guy you know? 09:25, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Agree with above JBEvans 11:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. It seems the author has blanked it anyway, so can it be speedied? --Tango 12:38, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a neologism. Possibly a vanity article; it has also been blanked by the author, except for the AFD notice. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 13:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above ^demon^{[yell at me]} _/03:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 01:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.