Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paranoia MUD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 00:43, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Paranoia MUD

Delete non-notable spamvertisement. dBed on 2/21 by Atarti2600tim (who has had admitted problems with the pages author), but doesn't satisfy a CSD criteria. PRODed by CDC shortly there-after, PROD was removed by page author without comment. Now it is here. --Karnesky 00:51, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete because there more appropriate places to advertise a MUD like MUD Connector. Green Giant 01:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertising, not encyclopedic. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as above. -Phorteetoo 01:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Zsinj^Talk 03:38, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Green Giant. Bobby1011 03:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: This is Wikipedia, not The Mud Connector. --Hetar 06:42, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. --Cymsdale 09:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Advertisment. There are better places to mention this MUD than in a WP article.  (aeropagitica)  23:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, adcopy per above. Kuru ^talk 05:19, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep By the way I didn't remove your effin PROD. 151.201.12.16 14:30, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually you did in this [1] edit, and either forgot to log in when making this comment, or else forgot that you're playing the anon character and that it was the Young Zaphod character that created the article. CheckUser may have a huge backlog, but this makes it a little easier to show the admins which anon sock puppets are you; now I don't have to wait on CheckUser, I can just point out this anon responding to comments about YZ and referring to him as "I". Thanks for your help. Also thanks for not doing multiple votes in the same edit and things like that this time, like past votes. --Atari2600tim (talk • contribs) 17:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for same reasons as other users. Purpose of article seems to be for promotion of his other articles. I mistakenly was looking at one of the other criteria lists; it indeed is appropriate to prod and afd, but not necessarily speedy. (Thanks, guys who fixed it) --Atari2600tim (talk • contribs) 17:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 10:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.