Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradoxonym

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete by Ultraexactzz, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Paradoxonym

Paradoxonym (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Word created by the author of the article, not notable. Drivenapart (talk) 17:07, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - Has the appearance of a vanity page with the creator of the word writing his own article. No supporting citations of word notability or accepted usage. Rob Banzai (talk) 17:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Violates WP:MADEUP. Anthony Rupert (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. This does have the appearance of a newly coined word, but that does not qualify for speedy deletion. It is not an "obvious hoax". No verifiability, no reliable sourcing, no Google scholar hits. Dlohcierekim 19:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.