Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradise-0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7 per author's admissions below. See WP:NFT. NawlinWiki 18:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paradise-0

Paradise-0 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, software notability superapathyman 03:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete for Crystalballery. --Dennisthe2 03:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom plus WP:NFT. Krimpet 03:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Josh Parris 04:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: whenever the phrase "not much is known about X" needs to be included in an article, it probably should never be in an article in the first place. --Haemo 07:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• No-comment as per the rules and guidelines on my user page and at WP:SOCK! --SockingIt 07:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - only ghits: [1]. Part Deux 08:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Fails WP:SOFTWARE. MER-C 10:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per Part Deux. Mathmo ^Talk 12:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep We are a bunch of college students making this thing. There is no other evidence that it exists yet except on our site becuase we only started working on it last week. Our company has no notability becuase, again, we just started it last week. Heck google hasn't even looked us over yet to put in a search. I'd put more of the story line and charactors and things like that up to try and prove it, but we haven't finished writting it yet. This thing is our final project for the course and it will be completed. If it isn't, all 19 of us, fail, and do not graduate. At least give us a few days to put more up before making the decision. Tyguy101a 16:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment You just outlined the reasons why I nominated this for deletion.

    "There is no other evidence that it exists yet except on our site becuase we only started working on it last week" 

    Wikipedia requires verifiability in articles

    "Our company has no notability becuase, again, we just started it last week." 

    Wikipedia articles need to be about notable subjects. Arguments saying that "it will be notable someday" are invalid

    "I'd put more of the story line and charactors and things like that up to try and prove it, but we haven't finished writting it yet." 

    Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

    "If it isn't, all 19 of us, fail, and do not graduate" 

    Good luck on the project, but I don't see what creating a Wikipedia article has to do with anything

  superapathyman 16:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Part of our grade comes from creating promotional materials as if it were going to have a wide release. I've seen things on other pages where it has a warning about the pages content. Could we have one of those? Tyguy101a 18:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Promotional material doesn't belong on Wikipedia, regardless of notability. Wikipedia is not a free webhost. If you want to create a promotional site, buy webhosting. superapathyman 18:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment We do have a site to promote it. I did my best to write the article from an unbiased stance. And Ive added a thing now saying it doesn't site referances and what not. Why don't you look at it now and tell me what I need to change. All we want is to exist. Tyguy101a 18:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.