Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradigm Journal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 05:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Paradigm Journal

Paradigm Journal (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:N with the only claim of notability being famous people contributing it. Fails WP:V having not a single third party source. In addition the article claims that the journal was created in January 2007 and the article was created just six months later by an editor claiming to be chief editor of the journal. BJ^Talk 22:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Google search shows nothing and there are no 3rd party references.  Atyndall93 | talk  01:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 13:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete A conflict of interest, non-notable magazine that has no reliable sources, just links to the company website. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 14:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable magazine, doesn't meet notability requirements. Razorflame 15:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. --JulesN Talk 20:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.