Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paracoccidioidomicosisproctitissarcomucosis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:15, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Paracoccidioidomicosisproctitissarcomucosis
- Delete: While this is a lovely little idea for a band, they've released only one full-length album (with a short tape and a split tape) which doesn't meet WP:BAND's guildeline of two full-length albums on major labels. No mentions on either Amazon or Allmusic. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Please note that the two full-length albums thing is only one of the things that could make a band notable. A band with one album will still be notable if they toured nationwide (whichever nation that may be) or if they stormed the charts. - Mgm|(talk) 13:55, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I learned that the hard way. I hate the tour line in there. What constitutes a tour? Playing in two different clubs in two days? What constitutes a national tour? Do they have to play from one end of the country to the other? If they only do half the country, is that only a half-national tour? What is a medium-sized country? If they played a gig on one side of Malaysia and then played one on the other side of Malaysia the next day, they're in?! How about one that got me - if they're an opening act or a headliner of a tour? Some opening acts barely even get on posters in the concert venue where they're playing! They're still in? —Wknight94 (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Please note that the two full-length albums thing is only one of the things that could make a band notable. A band with one album will still be notable if they toured nationwide (whichever nation that may be) or if they stormed the charts. - Mgm|(talk) 13:55, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete not notable Mariano(t/c) 07:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Wknight94. Essexmutant 11:31, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Like I said about Dilute To Five Percent Before Skin Application, will never meet WP:MUSIC with a name like that. --Malthusian (talk) 13:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: Wow, at least this name is mildly amusing. "Dilute To Five Percent Before Skin Application" just sounds dumb. —Wknight94 (talk) 14:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- To be fair, a band like Fuck theoretically wouldn't, either, but they're actually a decently popular indie band. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 16:13, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- With a discography of that size, I wouldn't consider bringing that band to Afd. At first glance, they look more notable than 90% of the bands here. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, right, but it just goes to show that a name doesn't mean everything. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 16:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Fuck I can pronounce. Fuck I know the meaning of. If I want to rave about how great Fuck is to my friends, I can finish saying their name before they get bored and wander off. 'Fuck' commands a bit of respect - personally I think it's childish, but to some it says "We're edgy, we're cool, we don't care what your parents think". Those other band names just say "We're a bunch of medical students" and "We have disgusting acne". :-) --Malthusian (talk) 16:28, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, right, but it just goes to show that a name doesn't mean everything. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 16:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- With a discography of that size, I wouldn't consider bringing that band to Afd. At first glance, they look more notable than 90% of the bands here. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MUSIC... and Fuck rules!--Isotope23 18:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I was going to vote keep, but they're not listed on their label's website.--M@rēino 19:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non notable Prodego talk 23:22, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
