Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pango (Drink)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pango (Drink)

Pango (Drink) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable per WP:N ukexpat (talk) 01:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. There should be a speedy category for drinks. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, the article pretty much states it's only sold in one place. It could probably be speedied for not asserting notability, actually. Esteffect (talk) 03:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. There is no speedy category for drinks otherwise I would have nominated it for speedy. – ukexpat (talk) 15:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. There is nothing in the article to indicate the drink's notability. Wikipedia is not a publicity engine. Notary137 (talk) 03:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 03:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - totally non-notable. —TreasuryTag talkcontribs 07:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment, non-notability is not a criteria for speedy deletion. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC).
• Delete, a drink sold in one single solitary student bar. No indication of any notability whatsoever. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.