Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pandrol clip

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was somebody's already dealt with it. — Feb. 28, '06 [10:42] <freakofnurxture|talk>

[edit] Pandrol clip

Delete sex toys are one thing, but this..? Rklawton 01:43, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

I shoulda thoughta merge Rklawton 17:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Peter Horn deleted the speedy tag while he was dinking around and writing this article --Ruby 02:23, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Why delete? Can any one sugest an alternative way to describe this device, or should the article become an entry in the Wiktionary? [1] [2] --Peter Horn 02:58, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete — Delete as not notable enough for its own article. Merge information in a relevant railroad article.
    — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib)  –  February 21, 2006, 04:05 (UTC)
  • Delete & Merge per Wtwilson3. ---J.Smith 06:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge into Rail tracks. There's probably a suprising amount you can write about something as unobtrusive as this piece of technology, but that content could quite happily sit in another article until there is enough to make it worth splitting out. GeorgeStepanek\talk 07:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge as per GeorgeStepanek Jcuk 09:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge as per GeorgeStepanek. So that's what they are called. — Graibeard (talk) 10:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge. It's worth knowing about but we don't have enough for its own article yet. Night Gyr
  • Merge I was the one who put the tag up but we could merge it into rail tracks. American Patriot 1776 14:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per GeorgeStepanek.--Isotope23 17:13, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Since it's already in the article, would anyone object to a bold redirect? Night Gyr 22:50, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Not at all, since it has already been boldly merged. GeorgeStepanek\talk 04:46, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Boldly Redirected. Night Gyr 12:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.