Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palackal

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Essjay · Talk 14:24, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Palackal

This appears to be autobiography by the newcomer Yawsep. I have left a note to this effect on his talk page (along with a welcome), but I don't think this article looks encyclopaedic. Gareth Hughes 18:42, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Sufficiently notable. --malathion ^talk 18:42, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn self-promotion. JamesBurns 06:05, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I am familiar with J. Palackal's earlier work on the musical study of Arnos Paathiri's Puththenpaana (see the references in the article which I have contributed on Arnos Paathiri). I can affirm that his work in that matter carries great distinction; it is a record of certain hallowed but sadly neglected cultural traditions among the Christians of Kerala (who have a history which extends to the apostles) and, as far as I am aware, it remains the only treatise on the topic. I did not know about the recent Ph. D. thesis that is mentioned in the biographical article, but I can deduce from the title the likely content; this is again, I think, a weighty topic (very different from the previous one), and I don't think there has been any study at all of Syriac music in Kerala, in spite of its great antiquity. I have felt that he is a scholar of moment, and also that his works are important to the future of an ancient culture. I also know of some of the activities of the Christian musicological society of India, which he heads: it has continued to play a significant part in moulding the Christian community in Kerala, chiefly through the study and innovative application of music and its traditions as a cultural medium. He certainly deserves a wikipedia article. I do not think the article should be deleted even if autobiographical (which I am unable to deduce for certain); what is written as of now is not biased or inappropriate, and I think it is only a fragment of what could be written about him. Italo 23:39, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.