Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan Social Democratic Party

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Golbez 06:57, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pakistan Social Democratic Party

Political party formed today. RickK 05:00, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC) Keep the rewrite. RickK 19:57, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

• I hope they enjoy their party. Delete. --FCYTravis 05:16, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• This newly formed party has 60 members. The article does not specify if any of them hold elected office which might confer notability. Delete. Keep Uncle G's rewrite - well done Uncle G.Capitalistroadster 05:29, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 05:46, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• keep notable Chubby Chicken 15:39, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. Above recently created account, Chubby Chicken, is voting "keep, notable" for numerous clearly non-notable (indeed bordering on speedy) articles. Please keep that grain of information in mind when counting votes. -- BD2412 ^talk 20:15, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
• Research confirms that this is definitely a real political party, so this hasn't just been made up for Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the party's web site (according to a list of socialist political parties around the world) is unreachable. However, this party has been around for longer than 1 day. In the National Assembly and provincial assembly elections in 2002 it put forward 1 candidate, with a wristwatch as the party symbol, who apparently didn't win; and in 2004 it was asked by the electoral commission along with 11 others to have its submitted statement of account audited by a chartered accountant and re-submitted, doing better than the 34 parties that didn't submit statements at all. Given that we cover other fielded-one-candidate-who-lost parties such as Your Political Party of British Columbia, The Common Good, and Emerged Democracy Party of British Columbia; and parties such as Republic Aotearoa New Zealand Party and New Zealand Family Rights Protection Party I'm currently at Weak Keep. Uncle G 15:54, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
• This article is not about the real Social Democratic Party of Pakistan, but more nonsense from creators of Pakistan Social Democratic Platform. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 18:28, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Ah. In which case ... Uncle G 19:14, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
• It is now. ☺ Rewritten article. Uncle G 19:14, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
  • And now I am changing my vote to abstain. - Mike Rosoft 02:35, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - definitely after rewrite gren 19:16, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Revolución 20:10, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, good rewrite. -- BD2412 ^talk 20:15, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
• Keep, thanks Uncle G Kappa 21:12, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable. —Seselwa 21:30, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.