Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pajaka, Udupi

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 18:07, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pajaka, Udupi

non-encyclopedic non-article DCEdwards1966 03:30, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)

• It's only a plan. Delete Hoary 03:38, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)
• Delete Paul August ☎ 03:39, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Xezbeth 06:04, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Maybe someone can try again if it's actually built. Delete Mgm|^(talk) 09:07, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Very Informative article. Helps the decendants of Madhvacharya to know more about their Guru. --Venu, Hyderabad, India [reformatted by Jerzy(t) 15:49, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)]
• Is Padapa a town or a city? If so, send to Cleanup for somebody to write an article about the place, not this plan. RickK 22:21, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 01:15, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Come back when it's done. 23skidoo 06:34, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. --Deathphoenix 03:25, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Carrp 00:05, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Ambivalent Delete. Too stubby and uninformative, this might be better expanded and merged into an appropriate article, where it would be more easily found, have more use and a be set in a context. Deleting it wouldn't hurt, since there's about 20 seconds of typing there at best. In context this might be suitable information if someone not familiar with the subject could be helped - by context and more information - to understand what it means. Pedant 22:35, 2005 Jan 12 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.