Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paizeis?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was non-admin keep per consensus. SorryGuy  Talk  08:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Paizeis?

Paizeis? (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

An album that didn't perform well. There are no sources supplied. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, albums for notable musicians are usually considered notable enough to keep. Lankiveil (talk) 13:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC).
• Keep per above; precedent is that albums officially released by a notable artist are themselves notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep this is one of the exceptions to the "notability is not inherited from X" rule. (jarbarf) (talk) 21:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.