Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Painterwork

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep, no consensus. SushiGeek 05:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Painterwork

After reading this EB-11 article, I came to the conclusion that it doesn't apply today _→AzaToth 20:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Keep and cleanup, possibly move to more appropriate title, possibly Painting techniques (currently a category with no main article by that name), merging any excessive content from the individual sections to the appropriate articles, leaving only a brief description. Add links to main articles where appropriate, such as Marbling. All of these techniques are still being used, and are considered skilled labour techniques. Some, such as gilding, are considered practically art forms, and skilled gilders are in demand. Consider also the historical aspect. KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: those working on cleaning up and updating the 1911 Britannica articles have expressed a desire to keep such articles for the time being so that they are not mistakenly reuploaded (with all of the OCR errors and formatting, it takes a lot of work just to cleanup the articles enough to be able to post them to Wikipedia, let alone update them, so this is not a trivial amount of work). -- Kjkolb 12:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.