Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pagan, Jenny L

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, an early closure per WP:SNOW. I should note, though, that being a hoax or autobiography isn't grounds for speedy deletion, at least per se. — TKD::Talk 22:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pagan, Jenny L

Pagan, Jenny L (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

An autobiographical article created just now. Attempts to assert notability as being a top 100 influential students in the US, but not backed by any sources, nor do any exist by searching her on Google. (Only 1 result.) It's likely to not satisfy WP:BIO as well. Alasdair 03:33, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Article appears to be mostly a joke. --Metropolitan90 04:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Joke article.--Danaman5 05:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Obvious hoax. faithless (speak) 05:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Hoax. Maxamegalon2000 05:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Most definitely a hoax. A quick google search shows up no hits at all for this subject. It is also impossible to verify the contents of this article as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 06:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete silly joke article, probably only funny to people who know whoever it is it's making fun of. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Maybe not a hoax per se, but either way it fails WP:BIO and notability. Burntsauce 17:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Being among the most influential students doesn't really give you notability, and there are no Google returns, so obviously the article good for the waste basket.--JForget 23:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • SPEEDY DELETE: CAN'T BELIEVE THIS JUNK IS STILL AROUND!(Sorry for yelling) Watchingthevitalsigns 02:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Dee Leet: While the previous poster should tone it down, this is a clear speedy case. Alba 04:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.