Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paddy Tunney (1956)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, given that no one has addressed the question of reliable sources with regards to notability. --Coredesat 03:03, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paddy Tunney (1956)

Paddy Tunney (1956) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Subject of article is non-notable; no reliable secondary sources Pathless 15:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete with comment Only ghits found are for subject's father. Is it even worth merging the info in this article into Paddy Tunney? --Ispy1981 16:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Paddy Tunney.--Edtropolis 16:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete without redirection. Redirection would be pointless, as no-one will search after Paddy Tunney (1956). Dr bab 19:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC).
• Delete - not independently notable and no one's going to use "Paddy Tunney (1956)" as a search string. Otto4711 18:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - of course he is notable! He has done much for both Irish traditional music and tourism in Donegal, which is perhaps a small enough region by world standards, but nonetheless is a place of note. Perhaps it could be redirected to a different title. --Letterkennyboi 20:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep _ Notable as he is chair of Comhaltas Ceoltóirí Éireann. End of.--Balloholic 23:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

• Are there multiple independent reliable sources that attest to his independent notability? Because as of right now his article is sourced by a website associated with Comhaltas Ceoltóirí Éireann (not independent) and the website for the secondary school where he teaches (also not independent). All very well and good to say "of course he's notable" but there must be sources to back up the assertion. Otto4711 13:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Per Dr bab. Astrale01^talk_contribs 21:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment It would be keepable if a source were added. --86.40.194.11 22:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.