Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paddock Club
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDY CLOSE. Nominator, Lumberjake (talk · contribs) has since been blocked due to sockpuppetry. Other questionable AfDs and removal of numerous PRODs. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 07:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Paddock Club
Non-notable. Kill it with fire. Lumberjake (talk) 22:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- KEEP. A gay bar in the South open for 30 years? Oldest continually operated gay bar in NC? That is certainly notable. A piece of gay history worth preserving, I'd say. Article can be improved stylistically and by addition of more references, but don't delete it. Textorus (talk) 02:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Textorus, plenty notable. Improve through regular editing per WP:AfD. Benjiboi 04:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- KEEP per Textorus. I grew up in the area and it's historic to many gay North Carolinians. I'll work on the article. --AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 04:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Look at this[1] edit by Lumberjake. Calling it "crap" isn't really the best way to voice your opinion of an article's worth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AgnosticPreachersKid (talk • contribs) 05:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Suck it SineBot.--AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 05:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Sourced, notable to Playboy magazine apparently. Nommed by someone with an account that is only 5 days old? *blinks* - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 04:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. User is obviously experienced although could be a new account rather than a sock, why? who knows. They also seem to have a deletionist bent but that's not always a bad thing. Using "kill with fire" on a subject about a gay bar in the south where places are often burned as hate crimes is problematic but otherwise they can weild the AfD ax like anyone else. Benjiboi 05:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. I'm not aware of connotations of the term, it's simply a phrase I picked up after lurking the Internets for many a year. And as for the axe reference... clever. Lumberjake (talk) 06:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. User is obviously experienced although could be a new account rather than a sock, why? who knows. They also seem to have a deletionist bent but that's not always a bad thing. Using "kill with fire" on a subject about a gay bar in the south where places are often burned as hate crimes is problematic but otherwise they can weild the AfD ax like anyone else. Benjiboi 05:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
