Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paco Sanchez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted by Dlohcierekim as nonsense, not notable, and was previously deleted once before as nonsense/hoax. Dlohcierekim 02:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Paco Sanchez

Paco Sanchez (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Patent nonsense. No evidence whatsoever that any of this genuine. Marked unreferenced for three months with no sources being provided. ShelfSkewed Talk 15:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom Canuck85 (talk) 15:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Seems like a WP:HOAX. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete for failing verifiability and the notability standard for biographies. Sounds totally hoaxalicious. Edison (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Marginally amusing; just might elicit a pitying grunt from a brick wall. That said, delete. :) Alloranleon (talk) 15:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Not even a hint of notability. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 16:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - Complete nonsense. Just some kids messing around. Scarian^{Call me Pat} 16:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - This wasn't speedy? WP:HOAXLonelyBeacon (talk) 16:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as a recreation of an article that was previously deleted (as hoax) and is substantially similar (I think). Pharmboy (talk) 16:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete stupid. JuJube (talk) 18:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Snowball delete as hoax per everyone else above. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per WP:HOAX. Macy's123 review me 23:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete G1 nonsense. I've tagged it.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 01:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• I changed my mind for a minute after noting that the "G in the HOOD" stuff was a result of vandalism, but it's still nonsensical and a hoax.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 02:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.