Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pac dots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pac Man. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-18 01:20Z

[edit] Pac dots

Pac dots (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A wonderful topic for an article, but sadly I think all that needs to be said (if anything) is here. Now, if you'll excuse me, I gotta run before that melon disappears. Peeper 13:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as noted above, this is covered in the main article. --Cyrus Andiron 13:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect - the easy, cheap, uncontroversial method :) It's remotely possible someone might use this as a search term and there's no harm in just making it a redirect to Pac Man. Arkyan • ^(talk) 15:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect - I was bold and went ahead and did it. I don't see a lot of debate on this one.Chunky Rice 16:43, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.