Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PTC Gz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PTC Gz

-I have proof they are reall, im a former student at MHS and they put out 2 CDS I have a link from our talent show way back in the day with a clip of them doing a song. It isnt that good as far as video quality cause we were young high school students running the production but here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glkxGZDoN4g look at it and cry people. It isn't verifiably notable. You can't even prove they exist. Urthogie 16:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

This user is currently involved with me in an edit war.--Urthogie 18:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep for their two LPs. Someone's going to look them up some time. Tyrenius 18:08, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Can you prove that they ever made those LP's? No, so its not verifiable.--Urthogie 18:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

I think this AfD is premature and should have been preceded by a Verify tag to give editors, who are probably not familiar with all the Wiki procedures, a chance to provide substantiation. Had this been done and nothing more was forthcoming, I would support the nom. I am conscious of BITE. Nor have any of the editors been notified on their talk pages of this AfD. It may be that a summary could find a place in the Peachtree City, Georgia article to augment the information on the city's "system of golf cart paths".Tyrenius 18:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete change vote on basis of Kickstart70's research, unless there is any verification to the contrary. Tyrenius 22:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I've spent 10 minutes trying to find any proof of those albums, any reviews of their appearances, any sign that this is not some elaborate put-on, and come up with nothing. If the editors who made this can provide some of the above to prove WP:V I'll consider changing the vote, but I really have my doubts this is possible. The page has existed since July 1, 2005 and this is still a serious question, so I must suggest deletion, as they've had plenty of time to add such verifiability. --Kickstart70-T-C 21:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Also, I'm guessing the Ptcg user in history is a perpetrator of this hoax/non-notable topic. --Kickstart70-T-C 21:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, WP:V as per Kickstart70's excellent research. --BrownHairedGirl 22:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete sounds like randomcrapcruft M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:53, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unless it can be sourced. --UsaSatsui 20:10, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.