Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PShaw comics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-19 12:05Z

[edit] PShaw comics

PShaw comics (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Suspected autobiography. Is the guy notable? -- RHaworth 07:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Yes, he's notable, and the notability assertion is right there in the article. He's regularly published in Arthur (magazine), which is easily verified by a quick google check of their site.[1] — coelacan talk — 10:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as vanity article. Too much stuff in the article is controversial and uncited, and given that the source was User:Pshazma, I would rather wipe the slate clean. No reason not to allow recreation later, though. Mangojuice^talk 18:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Nishkid64 18:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, though I have nothing against a sourced article by a neutral contributor (i.e. not the comic's author) at a later date – Qxz 20:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Mangojuice. --Aude (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.