Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PR0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Non-notable, Google-only terminology. --Stephen 00:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] PR0

PR0 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Not notable. All the encyclopedia information in here is inlcuded in Pagerank RogueNinja_talk 01:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete or rd to PageRank. JJL (talk) 02:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep — not all the worthwhile information in PR0 is in the PageRank article so the premise is false. PR0 is an important aspect of this important algorithm. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment — I have added references and done a cleanup. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment I didnt argue for deletion based on the fact that its not referenced or clean. Its just not a notable term. RogueNinja_talk 23:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - This information should be in the Pagerank article.SDSandecki (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.