Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PHPCow
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] PHPCow
contested speedy then prod. This company is not notable enough, fails WP:CORP. The username of the main contributor User:Phpcow.com suggest this is advertising more than anything else. Isn't this kind of usernames forbidden by the way? -- lucasbfr talk 02:55, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as spam per nom. I've sent the username to WP:AIV and tagged the userpage with {{db-g11}}. MER-C 06:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a speedy, as the article doesn't read like advertising (so isn't blatant). Proto::type 15:28, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 18:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete fails to assert notability under WP:SOFTWARE. Almost but not quite blatant enough to be speedyable. Demiurge 18:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. 175,000 Google results, but the most are just duplicates and costumer news websites, with no assertion of notability. Fails WP:SOFTWARE. Michaelas10 (Talk) 18:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete spam. — The Great Llamamoo? 19:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete spamvertisement. Bucketsofg 22:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete reads like an ad. Jam01 22:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. No coverage by reliable, third-party published sources. -- Satori Son 05:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete obvious article-spam. --Arvedui 03:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.